The purpose of Law 10/1991
In order to improve the processes of energy transformation, reduce energy consumption and improve the environmental compatibility of energy use the same service and quality of life, January 9, 1991 Law No. 10 encourages and promotes, in agreement with the energy policy of the European Economic Community, the rational use of energy, reduced consumption of energy in the production and use of artifacts, the use of renewable sources energy, reducing specific energy consumption in production processes, more rapid replacement of air in particular in the most energy intensive sectors, including through coordination between the stages of applied research, development and demonstration of industrial production. The policy of rational use of energy and rational use of energy raw materials defines a set of organic actions intended to promote energy conservation, appropriate use of energy sources, including conventional, improvement of technological processes that use or process energy, development of renewable energy, the replacement of energy raw materials are imported.
The wording of Article 26 paragraph 2 in 1991
To achieve the purposes set forth in the Law, Article 26 paragraph 2, provides for the deliberations of condominiums, a more easy: "For assistance in shares common buildings, aimed at containing the energy consumption of the buildings and the use of renewable energy in art. 1, including those in art. 8, apply the relevant decisions taken by a majority of the shares thousandths. "
was not the first time that the Legislature who are most special exemption to those provided by the Civil Code:
1) Law of 5 August 1978, n. 457, Article 30 paragraph 2 (Standards for residential construction) plans for recovery of private initiative are valid resolutions passed by a majority of condos that still represents at least half of the value of the building.
2) Law 9 January 1989, No 13, Article 2, paragraph 1 (provisions to encourage the overcoming and removal of architectural barriers in private buildings) are valid the resolutions passed in the first or second call, with the majority provided for in Article 1136, second and third paragraphs of the Civil Code.
3) Law March 24, 1989, No 122, article 9 (provisions relating to parking) is valid the resolutions passed in the first or second call, with the majority under Article 1136, second paragraph, of the Civil Code. It is understood the provisions of Articles 1120, second paragraph, and 1121, the third paragraph of the Civil Code.
4) January 9, 1991 Law No. 10, Article 26 paragraph 5: For the adoption of innovations in systems of thermoregulation and heat metering and the consequent allocation of the cost of heating according to consumption actually recorded, the assembly condominium decide by majority vote, in derogation from Articles 1120 and 1136 of the Civil Code.
5) Decree 23 January 2001, No 5, with amendments, in L. March 20, 2001, No 66, Article 2-bis, paragraph 13 (digital broadcasting on terrestrial frequencies. Audio Visual Systems terrestrial broadband - satellite dishes) in order to facilitate the development and dissemination of new technologies in broadcasting by satellite, the works of installation of new equipment innovations are required under Article 1120, first paragraph, the Civil Code. For the approval of their resolutions, Article 1136, third paragraph of the Code.
6) Law June 18, 2009, No 69, article 1, section 7 (Step of fiber optic cables): the provisions of Article 2-bis, paragraph 13 of Law Decree 23 January 2001, No 5, with amendments, into law March 20, 2001, No 66, also apply to condominium innovations relating to renovation required the passage of fiber optic cables.
Unlike most special rules contained in the above mentioned, the legislature of 1991 and 2006, in reference to Article 26 paragraph 2 of Law 10/91, only made reference to the thousandth quota and not the majority refers to the number of condominiums in derogation of the principle of double quorum (heads and thousandths).
Under invoked Article 1 of that Act (in the original), are considered sources of energy, having the character of public interest and public utilities:
- renewable sources of energy or assimilated: the sun, the wind, ' hydropower, geothermal resources, tides, waves and the transformation of organic and inorganic waste or plant products - sources of energy assimilated to renewable sources of energy: combined heat and power, understood as the combined production of electrical or mechanical energy and heat, the energy recovered in the exhaust and heating systems from electrical and industrial processes, as well as other forms of energy recoverable in processes, systems and products including energy savings achieved in air-conditioning and lighting of buildings with interventions on the building envelope and installations.
interventions mentioned in Article 8 of the Act are as follows:
a) insulation in existing buildings to enable energy savings of at least 20 percent, and adhere to the technical regulations in Annex Table A.
b) installation of new high-efficiency heat generators, which represent a steady state performance, measured by direct method of not less than 90 per cent, both in new buildings and existing ones;
c) installation of heat pumps for space heating or water or sanitary facilities for the use of renewable energy that provide for recovery at least 30 percent of the heating requirements of the system in which the intervention is implemented under the provisions of Title II;
d) installation of production equipment combined electricity and heat;
e) installation of photovoltaic systems for electricity production, for such interventions the contribution may be increased up to 80 percent;
f) installation of integrated control systems and accounting separation consumption of heat as well as heat and hot water for each housing unit, computerized systems for monitoring and management of air conditioning as well as centralized processing and self to achieve the objectives of Article. 1;
g) processing of centralized heating systems in detached gas for heating and domestic hot water equipped with automatic temperature control, entered in buildings with more housing units, with determination of consumption for individual units, except those located in areas identified by the regions and autonomous provinces of Trento and Bolzano in accordance with Article . 6, where heating networks are present;
h) installation of high efficiency lighting systems, even in outdoor areas.
Article 8 above, it draws attention to the letter "g", by which the Law 10/91 wanted to encourage the processing of central heating systems in single-family plants.
In reference to the majorities 's approval of the works, had formed the orientation according to which the resolution was duly taken with a majority share in thousandths (501/1000).
Regarding the implementation instead of the whole as indicated in Article 26, Article 28 paragraph 1, the same Law also provided a draft of the works themselves necessarily be accompanied by a technical report, signed by the designer, who shall certify the compliance of the law. Loomed the question whether the act of interpretation, for its validity, should be accompanied by the above project with the technical report.
On this point, the Supreme Court, almost unanimously believed that the resolution condominium conversion of the centralized heating systems in single-family, is valid even if not accompanied by the proposal of works accompanied by a technical report in accordance with Art. 28, paragraph 1, doing this project to the next phase of implementation of the resolution. Such standards, as part of the processes of heating systems designed to save energy, a fact distinguish deliberation "internal" (pertaining to the relationship between the condominiums, subject notwithstanding art. 1120 cc) from an execution phase "external" (relative to the jurisdiction of the successive steps of pa), and only for the latter impose the obligations in argomento (Cass. civ. sez. II, 20 febbraio 2009, n. 4216, Cass. civ. sez. II, 11 maggio 2006, n. 10871, Cass. civ. sez. II, 18 agosto 2005, n. 16980, Cass. civ., sez. II, 29 gennaio 2002, n. 1166, Cass. civ. sez. II, 25 maggio 2001, n. 7130, Cass. civ., sez. II, 26 maggio 1999, n. 5117). Era invece illegittima la deliberazione dell'assemblea del condominio di un edificio adottata a maggioranza delle quote millesimali (anzichè con il consenso unanime di tutti i condomini richiesto dall'art. 1120, comma 2, c.c.) con la quale si prevedeva la trasformazione dell'impianto di riscaldamento centralizzato in impianti unifamiliari e si autorizzava ogni condomino a provvedere autonomamente ad installare l'impianto che ritiene fit, without reference to compliance with the requirements of LN 10 of 1991 for the reduction of energy consumption (Civil Cassation, Section II, May 26, 1999, No 5117)
The wording of Article 26 paragraph 2 in 2006
was not the first time that the Legislature who are most special exemption to those provided by the Civil Code:
1) Law of 5 August 1978, n. 457, Article 30 paragraph 2 (Standards for residential construction) plans for recovery of private initiative are valid resolutions passed by a majority of condos that still represents at least half of the value of the building.
2) Law 9 January 1989, No 13, Article 2, paragraph 1 (provisions to encourage the overcoming and removal of architectural barriers in private buildings) are valid the resolutions passed in the first or second call, with the majority provided for in Article 1136, second and third paragraphs of the Civil Code.
3) Law March 24, 1989, No 122, article 9 (provisions relating to parking) is valid the resolutions passed in the first or second call, with the majority under Article 1136, second paragraph, of the Civil Code. It is understood the provisions of Articles 1120, second paragraph, and 1121, the third paragraph of the Civil Code.
4) January 9, 1991 Law No. 10, Article 26 paragraph 5: For the adoption of innovations in systems of thermoregulation and heat metering and the consequent allocation of the cost of heating according to consumption actually recorded, the assembly condominium decide by majority vote, in derogation from Articles 1120 and 1136 of the Civil Code.
5) Decree 23 January 2001, No 5, with amendments, in L. March 20, 2001, No 66, Article 2-bis, paragraph 13 (digital broadcasting on terrestrial frequencies. Audio Visual Systems terrestrial broadband - satellite dishes) in order to facilitate the development and dissemination of new technologies in broadcasting by satellite, the works of installation of new equipment innovations are required under Article 1120, first paragraph, the Civil Code. For the approval of their resolutions, Article 1136, third paragraph of the Code.
6) Law June 18, 2009, No 69, article 1, section 7 (Step of fiber optic cables): the provisions of Article 2-bis, paragraph 13 of Law Decree 23 January 2001, No 5, with amendments, into law March 20, 2001, No 66, also apply to condominium innovations relating to renovation required the passage of fiber optic cables.
Unlike most special rules contained in the above mentioned, the legislature of 1991 and 2006, in reference to Article 26 paragraph 2 of Law 10/91, only made reference to the thousandth quota and not the majority refers to the number of condominiums in derogation of the principle of double quorum (heads and thousandths).
Under invoked Article 1 of that Act (in the original), are considered sources of energy, having the character of public interest and public utilities:
- renewable sources of energy or assimilated: the sun, the wind, ' hydropower, geothermal resources, tides, waves and the transformation of organic and inorganic waste or plant products - sources of energy assimilated to renewable sources of energy: combined heat and power, understood as the combined production of electrical or mechanical energy and heat, the energy recovered in the exhaust and heating systems from electrical and industrial processes, as well as other forms of energy recoverable in processes, systems and products including energy savings achieved in air-conditioning and lighting of buildings with interventions on the building envelope and installations.
interventions mentioned in Article 8 of the Act are as follows:
a) insulation in existing buildings to enable energy savings of at least 20 percent, and adhere to the technical regulations in Annex Table A.
b) installation of new high-efficiency heat generators, which represent a steady state performance, measured by direct method of not less than 90 per cent, both in new buildings and existing ones;
c) installation of heat pumps for space heating or water or sanitary facilities for the use of renewable energy that provide for recovery at least 30 percent of the heating requirements of the system in which the intervention is implemented under the provisions of Title II;
d) installation of production equipment combined electricity and heat;
e) installation of photovoltaic systems for electricity production, for such interventions the contribution may be increased up to 80 percent;
f) installation of integrated control systems and accounting separation consumption of heat as well as heat and hot water for each housing unit, computerized systems for monitoring and management of air conditioning as well as centralized processing and self to achieve the objectives of Article. 1;
g) processing of centralized heating systems in detached gas for heating and domestic hot water equipped with automatic temperature control, entered in buildings with more housing units, with determination of consumption for individual units, except those located in areas identified by the regions and autonomous provinces of Trento and Bolzano in accordance with Article . 6, where heating networks are present;
h) installation of high efficiency lighting systems, even in outdoor areas.
Article 8 above, it draws attention to the letter "g", by which the Law 10/91 wanted to encourage the processing of central heating systems in single-family plants.
In reference to the majorities 's approval of the works, had formed the orientation according to which the resolution was duly taken with a majority share in thousandths (501/1000).
Regarding the implementation instead of the whole as indicated in Article 26, Article 28 paragraph 1, the same Law also provided a draft of the works themselves necessarily be accompanied by a technical report, signed by the designer, who shall certify the compliance of the law. Loomed the question whether the act of interpretation, for its validity, should be accompanied by the above project with the technical report.
On this point, the Supreme Court, almost unanimously believed that the resolution condominium conversion of the centralized heating systems in single-family, is valid even if not accompanied by the proposal of works accompanied by a technical report in accordance with Art. 28, paragraph 1, doing this project to the next phase of implementation of the resolution. Such standards, as part of the processes of heating systems designed to save energy, a fact distinguish deliberation "internal" (pertaining to the relationship between the condominiums, subject notwithstanding art. 1120 cc) from an execution phase "external" (relative to the jurisdiction of the successive steps of pa), and only for the latter impose the obligations in argomento (Cass. civ. sez. II, 20 febbraio 2009, n. 4216, Cass. civ. sez. II, 11 maggio 2006, n. 10871, Cass. civ. sez. II, 18 agosto 2005, n. 16980, Cass. civ., sez. II, 29 gennaio 2002, n. 1166, Cass. civ. sez. II, 25 maggio 2001, n. 7130, Cass. civ., sez. II, 26 maggio 1999, n. 5117). Era invece illegittima la deliberazione dell'assemblea del condominio di un edificio adottata a maggioranza delle quote millesimali (anzichè con il consenso unanime di tutti i condomini richiesto dall'art. 1120, comma 2, c.c.) con la quale si prevedeva la trasformazione dell'impianto di riscaldamento centralizzato in impianti unifamiliari e si autorizzava ogni condomino a provvedere autonomamente ad installare l'impianto che ritiene fit, without reference to compliance with the requirements of LN 10 of 1991 for the reduction of energy consumption (Civil Cassation, Section II, May 26, 1999, No 5117)
The wording of Article 26 paragraph 2 in 2006
Later, in 2006, the Legislature, the Legislative Decree 311 of 29 December (corrective and supplementary provisions to the Legislative Decree 19 August 2005, No. 192 implementing Directive 2002/91/EC on the energy performance of ' building), Article 7 added a paragraph to Article 16 bis of Legislative Decree No. 192 August 19, 2005 (Implementation of Directive 2002/91/EC on the energy performance buildings). This article was to amend Article 26 paragraph 2 of Law 10/1991 which was thus: "For work on buildings and plants designed to contain energy consumption and use of renewable energy in Article 1 identified through an energy performance certificate or an energy audit performed by a qualified engineer, the relevant decisions of condominium shall be valid if adopted by a simple majority of the shares thousandths. "
for ease of reading, below are made to compare the two versions of the standard:
for ease of reading, below are made to compare the two versions of the standard:
| Article 26 paragraph 2 (1991) | Articolo 26 comma 2 (2006) |
| Per gli interventi in parti comuni di edifici, volti al contenimento del consumo energetico degli edifici stessi ed all'utilizzazione delle fonti di energia di cui all'art. 1, ivi compresi quelli di cui all'art. 8, sono valide le relative decisioni prese a maggioranza delle quote millesimali | Per gli interventi sugli edifici e sugli impianti volti al contenimento del consumo energetico ed all'utilizzazione delle fonti di energia di cui all'articolo 1, individuati attraverso un attestato di certificazione energetica o una diagnosi energetica realizzata da un tecnico abilitato, le pertinenti decisioni condominiali sono valide se adottate con la maggioranza semplice delle quote millesimali. |
Per completezza, è il caso di precisare che, pochi mesi dopo, l'art. 1, comma 1120 della L. 27 dicembre 2006, n. 296 (in vigore dal 2007) andava a modificare l'articolo 1 comma 3 della Legge 10/91 cui l'art. 26 comma 2 rinvia:
| Articolo 1 comma 3 (1991) | Articolo 1 comma 3 (2007) |
| Ai fini della presente legge sono considerate fonti rinnovabili di energia o assimilate: il sole, il vento, l'energia idraulica, le risorse geotermiche, le maree, il moto ondoso e la trasformazione dei rifiuti organici and inorganic or plant products. They are also considered sources of energy assimilated to renewable sources of energy: combined heat and power, understood as the combined production of electrical or mechanical energy and heat, the energy recovered in the exhaust and heating systems, electrical systems and from industrial processes, as well as other forms of energy recoverable in processes, systems and products including energy savings achieved in air-conditioning and lighting of buildings with interventions on the building envelope and installations. For organic and inorganic waste remains firm, the existing rules and in particular the rules contained in the Decree of the President September 10, 1982, No 915 and subsequent amendments and additions to Decree-Law of 31 August 1987, n. 361, with amendments, into law October 29, 1987, No 441, and Decree-Law 9 September 1988, No 397, converted with amendments by Law of November 9, 1988, No 475. | the purposes of this Act shall be considered renewable energy sources: sun, wind, hydropower, geothermal resources, tides, waves and processing of organic waste or crop production. For organic and inorganic waste remains firm, the existing rules and in particular the rules contained in the Decree of the President September 10, 1982, No 915, as amended and supplemented, Decree-Law of 31 August 1987, n. 361, with amendments, into law October 29, 1987, No 441, and Decree-Law 9 September 1988, No 397, ratified with amendments by Law 9 November 1988, No 475. |
Back to Article 26 paragraph 2, it soon becomes clear three major changes:
1) there is no reference to the actions listed in Article 8 (including, remember, the transformation of plants central heating systems in detached gas for heating and domestic hot water)
2) interventions on buildings and installations should be identified through an energy performance certificate or an energy audit performed by a qualified engineer, this document must already exist at the time of deliberation (as opposed to the project as originally formulated, as we have seen, could be drafted at a later date). This requirement is a penalty of invalidity of the act itself (Triola, The condo, Giuffrè Editore, 2007, page 228)
3) change the wording referred to the decisions, and Monthly, after the word "majority" is added to the adjective "simple" while it remains unchanged the reference to shares only thousandths.
The new wording of Article 26 paragraph 2 (majority ”semplice” delle quote millesimali) aprì tra gli studiosi del diritto un ampio dibattito in merito all'interpretazione della norma così modificata a seguito dell'aggiunta dell'aggettivo “semplice”. La giurisprudenza non aveva avuto ancora modo di pronunciarsi e vi era la più grande incertezza.
La formulazione dell'articolo 26 comma 2 nel 2009
In questo contesto, il Parlamento ha definitivamente approvato il progetto di legge 1195-B (Senato) il quale, all'articolo 27, comma 22 cosi' recita: “Al comma 2 dell'articolo 26 della legge 9 gennaio 1991, n.10, come sostituito dall'articolo 7 del decreto legislativo 29 dicembre 2006, n. 311, dopo le words: "a simple majority of the shares thousandth" are added as follows: "represented by those present at the meeting". "
a result of the amendment, Article 26 paragraph 2 now reads: "For work on buildings and plants designed to contain energy consumption and use of renewable energy in Article 1, identified by a certificate certification of energy or an energy audit performed by a qualified engineer, the relevant decisions of condominium shall be valid if adopted by a simple majority of the shares represented by those present at the meeting thousandths. "
The law is now pending publication in the Official Ufficiale.
Il legislatore ha così lasciato invariato il riferimento alle sole quote millesimali in deroga al generale principio della necessità del doppio quorum (teste e millesimi). Ha però precisato che la “maggioranza semplice delle quote millesimali” è riferita agli “intervenuti in assemblea”.
Si ricorda che il legislatore gia' nella formulazione dell'art. 26 comma 2 nel 1991 aveva utilizzato il termine “quote millesimali” in luogo di “valore dell'edificio” così come invece indicato nell'articolo 1136 del codice civile e nella Legge 457/1978 art. 30 co. 2. Il riferimento ai millesimi è stato utilizzato nel codice civile nell'articolo 68 implementing arrangements which specifies that "The values \u200b\u200bof the plans or portions of the plan, briefed to the entire building must be expressed in milliseconds in a special table attached to the building regulations."
The verb "represent" (introduced with the recent amendment) has instead been used by the legislator in 1136 of the Civil Code, the only difference being that in the code are the condos (1136 co 1 cc) or the number of votes (1136 co 2, 3 and 5 cc) or most (Law 457/1978 art. 30 CO 2) that represent the value of the building (or units thousandth). In 26 CO 2 L. 10/91, however, are the odds millesimali che sono rappresentate dagli intervenuti.
Fatte queste piccole precisazioni, entrando nel merito della norma di legge qui in commento, dalla frase “maggioranza semplice delle quote millesimali rappresentate dagli intervenuti in assemblea” intenderei che sono le quote millesimali (e non la maggioranza) ad essere rappresentate dagli intervenuti in assemblea. Se fosse stata la maggioranza ad essere rappresentata dagli intervenuti in assemblea (cosi' come indicato dalla Legge 457 del 1978 all'art. 30 comma 2), la frase sarebbe stata del seguente tenore: “La maggioranza semplice delle quote millesimali rappresentata dagli intervenuti in assemblea”.
In prima convocazione, come è noto, paragraph 1 of Article 1136 Civil Code provides that the Assembly is validly constituted with the participation of many apartment buildings that represent two-thirds of the value of the building and two-thirds of participants in the condominium. As the new wording of Article 26 paragraph 2 L. 10/91 refers only to the thousandth shares represented by those present and the meeting of participants in the condominium, it follows that, on first call, having to be two-thirds of the value of the building, the decision can be validly taken if they are favorable many condominiums carrying at least one third plus one of the vintages, these shares could also belong to a single condominium. Unlike
is instead the case of the second call in which the legislature has provided only a quorum and a quorum (Cass. civ., sect. II, January 28, 1997, n. 850).
Since it is not a quorum minimum so that the Assembly is validly constituted, need to refer only to the quorum necessary for the validity of the proceedings (Civil Cassation, Section II, April 26, 1994 n 3952).
is therefore now wonder what, on second call, a quorum for the validity of the proceedings pursuant to Article 26 paragraph 2 L. 10/91.
The legislation requires the majority of shares but does not specify a minimum micron.
Inoltre il termine “assemblea” (che prevede la presenza di più persone) ed il plurale del termine “intervenuti”, non avendo il legislatore indicato un numero minimo di partecipanti, farebbero ritenere che debbano essere presenti almeno due condomini.
Poichè, come sopra riferito, il Legislatore fa riferimento alle quote millesimali rappresentate dagli intervenuti, a mio avviso è sufficiente che all'assemblea partecipino almeno due condomini. A questo punto, stante la presenza in assemblea in seconda convocazione di almeno due condomini ed indipendentemente dal valore delle quote millesimali rappresentate, e' valida la deliberazione assunta con la maggioranza dei millesimi degli almeno due presenti. It follows that this Dick (Mill.ar 150) and Caio (mill 100), the decision would be valid when they have only voted for the Dick (bearer of the majority of shares represented by those present at the meeting thousandth).
a result of the amendment, Article 26 paragraph 2 now reads: "For work on buildings and plants designed to contain energy consumption and use of renewable energy in Article 1, identified by a certificate certification of energy or an energy audit performed by a qualified engineer, the relevant decisions of condominium shall be valid if adopted by a simple majority of the shares represented by those present at the meeting thousandths. "
The law is now pending publication in the Official Ufficiale.
Il legislatore ha così lasciato invariato il riferimento alle sole quote millesimali in deroga al generale principio della necessità del doppio quorum (teste e millesimi). Ha però precisato che la “maggioranza semplice delle quote millesimali” è riferita agli “intervenuti in assemblea”.
Si ricorda che il legislatore gia' nella formulazione dell'art. 26 comma 2 nel 1991 aveva utilizzato il termine “quote millesimali” in luogo di “valore dell'edificio” così come invece indicato nell'articolo 1136 del codice civile e nella Legge 457/1978 art. 30 co. 2. Il riferimento ai millesimi è stato utilizzato nel codice civile nell'articolo 68 implementing arrangements which specifies that "The values \u200b\u200bof the plans or portions of the plan, briefed to the entire building must be expressed in milliseconds in a special table attached to the building regulations."
The verb "represent" (introduced with the recent amendment) has instead been used by the legislator in 1136 of the Civil Code, the only difference being that in the code are the condos (1136 co 1 cc) or the number of votes (1136 co 2, 3 and 5 cc) or most (Law 457/1978 art. 30 CO 2) that represent the value of the building (or units thousandth). In 26 CO 2 L. 10/91, however, are the odds millesimali che sono rappresentate dagli intervenuti.
Fatte queste piccole precisazioni, entrando nel merito della norma di legge qui in commento, dalla frase “maggioranza semplice delle quote millesimali rappresentate dagli intervenuti in assemblea” intenderei che sono le quote millesimali (e non la maggioranza) ad essere rappresentate dagli intervenuti in assemblea. Se fosse stata la maggioranza ad essere rappresentata dagli intervenuti in assemblea (cosi' come indicato dalla Legge 457 del 1978 all'art. 30 comma 2), la frase sarebbe stata del seguente tenore: “La maggioranza semplice delle quote millesimali rappresentata dagli intervenuti in assemblea”.
In prima convocazione, come è noto, paragraph 1 of Article 1136 Civil Code provides that the Assembly is validly constituted with the participation of many apartment buildings that represent two-thirds of the value of the building and two-thirds of participants in the condominium. As the new wording of Article 26 paragraph 2 L. 10/91 refers only to the thousandth shares represented by those present and the meeting of participants in the condominium, it follows that, on first call, having to be two-thirds of the value of the building, the decision can be validly taken if they are favorable many condominiums carrying at least one third plus one of the vintages, these shares could also belong to a single condominium. Unlike
is instead the case of the second call in which the legislature has provided only a quorum and a quorum (Cass. civ., sect. II, January 28, 1997, n. 850).
Since it is not a quorum minimum so that the Assembly is validly constituted, need to refer only to the quorum necessary for the validity of the proceedings (Civil Cassation, Section II, April 26, 1994 n 3952).
is therefore now wonder what, on second call, a quorum for the validity of the proceedings pursuant to Article 26 paragraph 2 L. 10/91.
The legislation requires the majority of shares but does not specify a minimum micron.
Inoltre il termine “assemblea” (che prevede la presenza di più persone) ed il plurale del termine “intervenuti”, non avendo il legislatore indicato un numero minimo di partecipanti, farebbero ritenere che debbano essere presenti almeno due condomini.
Poichè, come sopra riferito, il Legislatore fa riferimento alle quote millesimali rappresentate dagli intervenuti, a mio avviso è sufficiente che all'assemblea partecipino almeno due condomini. A questo punto, stante la presenza in assemblea in seconda convocazione di almeno due condomini ed indipendentemente dal valore delle quote millesimali rappresentate, e' valida la deliberazione assunta con la maggioranza dei millesimi degli almeno due presenti. It follows that this Dick (Mill.ar 150) and Caio (mill 100), the decision would be valid when they have only voted for the Dick (bearer of the majority of shares represented by those present at the meeting thousandth).
0 comments:
Post a Comment